Bettiah Raj: Difference between revisions
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 45: | Line 45: | ||
| data17 = ₹2,300,000 (23 lakhs, late 19th century) | | data17 = ₹2,300,000 (23 lakhs, late 19th century) | ||
}} | }} | ||
'''Bettiah Raj''', historically known as the '''Champaran Chieftaincy or Riyasat-e-Sirkar Champaran''' , was a major [[zamindari]] estate and pre-colonial chieftaincy in the Champaran region of present-day Bihar, India.<ref name="Gazetteer">O'Malley, L. S. S. (1907). ''Bengal District Gazetteers: Champaran''. Calcutta: The Bengal Secretariat Book Depot, pp. 138-141.</ref> Ranking among the primary hereditary landed estates of Northern India during the Mughal and British periods, the estate covered an area of approximately | '''Bettiah Raj''', historically known as the '''Champaran Chieftaincy or Riyasat-e-Sirkar Champaran''' , was a major [[zamindari]] estate and pre-colonial chieftaincy in the Champaran region of present-day Bihar, India.<ref name="Gazetteer">O'Malley, L. S. S. (1907). ''Bengal District Gazetteers: Champaran''. Calcutta: The Bengal Secretariat Book Depot, pp. 138-141.</ref> Bettiah remained the oldest raj in the region and had been a branch of the ''raj rayasat Sirkar'' of Champaran since the sixteenth century. Ranking among the primary hereditary landed estates of Northern India during the Mughal and British periods, the estate covered an area of approximately 5180 square kilometers (2000 sq. miles).<ref>[https://books.google.co.in/books?id=3aAwBQAAQBAJ&dq=bettiah+raj&pg=PA23&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=bettiah%20raj&f=false Satyagraha In Champaran] by Rajendra Prasad, p. 23</ref> By the late 19th century, it generated an annual revenue of over 23 lakh rupees (₹2.3 million), a figure higher than that of most zamindari estates in India.<ref name="ImperialGazetteer">''Imperial Gazetteer of India''. Vol. VIII. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1908, pp. 10-12.</ref> | ||
Historians classify Bettiah Raj as one of the few prominent zamindaris whose local authority evolved directly from pre-Mughal chieftaincies rather than solely from imperial revenue grants.<ref name="Yang1989">Yang, Anand A. (1989). ''The Limited Raj: Agrarian Order and Colonial Administration in Bihar, 1793-1922''. University of California Press, pp. 52-55.</ref> The estate was held by the Jaithariya mool of the [[Bhumihar]] (Bābhan) community and maintained genealogical and matrimonial alliances with the rulers of Banaras State and other prominent regional landed families.<ref name="Gazetteer" /> | Historians classify Bettiah Raj as one of the few prominent zamindaris whose local authority evolved directly from pre-Mughal chieftaincies rather than solely from imperial revenue grants.<ref name="Yang1989">Yang, Anand A. (1989). ''The Limited Raj: Agrarian Order and Colonial Administration in Bihar, 1793-1922''. University of California Press, pp. 52-55.</ref> In 1765, when the East India Company acquired the Diwani, the Bettiah Raj held the '''largest territory under its jurisdiction'''.<ref name=":0">[https://www.google.co.in/books/edition/Land_and_Society_in_India/2b_j0mNe2FwC?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=In+1765,+when+the+East+India+Company+acquired+the+Diwani,+the+Bettiah+Raj+held+the+largest&pg=PA37&printsec=frontcover Land and Society in India] p. 37</ref><ref>[https://www.google.co.in/books/edition/BRAHMAN_ITIHASA_FORGOTTEN_HISTORY_OF_BHA/spddEAAAQBAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=In+1765,+when+the+East+India+Company+acquired+the+Diwani,+the+Bettiah+Raj+held+the+largest&pg=PA276&printsec=frontcover BRAHMAN ITIHASA '''By PEEYUSH SHARMA'''] p. 276</ref> Its estate comprised almost all of Champaran, except for a small portion held by few smaller zamindaris. Later, the Bettiah Raj was divided into three branches, with the principal branch retaining Bettiah Raj and the two minor branches forming the Sheohar Raj and Madhuban Raj. As a result, the territorial extent of Bettiah Raj was reduced.<ref>[https://archive.org/details/dli.ministry.07447 Bihar and Orisha District Gazetteers by O'Malley]</ref> The Bettiah Raj developed through ''malikana chaudharai'' and ''qanungo'i'', which connected it with the revenue administration and strengthened its local dominance and ability to control and protect numerous villages.<ref name=":0" /> The estate was held by the Jaithariya mool of the [[Bhumihar]] (Bābhan) community and maintained genealogical and matrimonial alliances with the rulers of Banaras State and other prominent regional landed families.<ref name="Gazetteer" /> | ||
== History == | == History == | ||
| Line 177: | Line 177: | ||
=== Revenue Significance === | === Revenue Significance === | ||
By the late 19th century, the estate yielded an annual revenue of ₹2,300,000 (23 lakh rupees), making it one of the wealthiest landed jurisdictions in British India | By the late 19th century, the estate yielded an annual revenue of ₹2,300,000 (23 lakh rupees), making it one of the wealthiest landed jurisdictions in British India.<ref name="ImperialGazetteer" /> | ||
== Cultural Patronage and Social Institutions == | == Cultural Patronage and Social Institutions == | ||